July 31, 2007 by Marc Lamont Hill

Michael Vick stands in judgment, and it goes without saying that a generation of young black male athletes also stand in judgment. More than Allen Iverson, Kobe Bryant and Pacman “sometimes you need to just call a dangerous psychopath a ‘dangerous’ psychopath” Jones, Michael Vick has now become the stand-in for all that ails professional sports. And it’s not fair, but Michael Vick and his generational cohorts should know better.
The current crop of black male athletes are more visible and better compensated than every generation of black athletes that came before them. And for some of these young athletes, they believe they are beyond reproach because of it, particularly if said criticism comes from the generation of black athletes who toiled on fields, courts and tracks without the glamour and prestige that these young athletes now take for granted. I’m always reminded of Vince Coleman, a former major league baseball player who, months after signing a free-agent contract with the New York Mets in 1991, claimed that he didn’t know who Curt Flood was. It was Flood who, 20 years earlier, challenged the reserve clause in baseball, which essentially made baseball players little more than salaried chattel. Flood was the reason why Coleman and countless others can become free agents and sale their talents to the highest bidder.
As we witness the wealthiest generation of professional athletes ever, increasingly the professionalization process is beginning in childhood, as kids as young as seven and eight years of age are already being prepared for lives in professional sports. It is in this context that many of these athletes, particularly if they are black males, are denied the fullest range of social and cultural experience. The by-product is a generation of young rich athletes who, when they are not toiling for the NBA or NFL, are sitting at home playing video games 10 hours a day, before they hit the club. Lots of money and too much time on their hands and it explains, in part, why figures like Charles Barkley and Michael Jordan might gamble away millions of dollars, why former NBA star Jayson Williams (the black one) might be sitting in his bedroom playing with guns, or why an athlete might become interested in betting on dog fights. The irony is that given their largely unprecedented wealth, this is a generation of athletes who could truly afford to experience the world in ways that their predecessors could only imagine.
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
9 Comments
1. Garrett wrote:
If a professional athlete, in any sport, wants to learn how to act like a pro, and a gentleman for that matter, they could do no better than to emulate Hank Aaron.
Skill in a sport does not necessarily equate to being a good person.
July 31, 2007 @ 12:28 pm2. Marc Lamont Hill wrote:
Tom Penn,
When have I ever celebrated corporate endorsement deals? I have no idea what you’re talking about. To the contrary, I have written extensively about the dangers of corporate deals in relation to the construction of artifical desire and the expansion of global capitalism. Please explain
July 31, 2007 @ 12:37 pm3. Garrett wrote:
Global capitalism sure beats the hell out of global communism.
July 31, 2007 @ 3:06 pm4. Marc Lamont Hill wrote:
umm, i didn’t mention marxism or communism. i’m simply saying that 24 hours of commercials telling kids that they NEED $100 sneakers is a problem.
July 31, 2007 @ 3:57 pm5. Garrett wrote:
Ok, then: Which do you prefer, capitalism or communism?
July 31, 2007 @ 4:23 pm6. Garrett wrote:
I’m not taking the samples, ting, I’m flushing them. The marxist ideas MLH professes will never take hold in our country, thank goodness.
August 1, 2007 @ 12:18 pm7. ting wrote:
And hopefully the same hate you spew on this site everyday is not inflicted upon and infecting your very own children……it’s a wonder why people aren’t given licenses to become parents but you need them to drive.
August 1, 2007 @ 3:50 pm8. Retro Jordans wrote:
I wonder how much money Jordan has made from his shoe line? Probably in the billions!
November 2, 2007 @ 5:13 pm9. Jordans wrote:
those are some hot kicks
December 2, 2007 @ 2:20 pmLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments

