Yet Another Reason Why Wal Mart is Evil…
November 20, 2007 by Marc Lamont Hill
The big-box company’s new glossy environmental report can’t hide that its fundamental problem is its business model.
Wal-Mart’s New Greenwashing Report
By Sarah Anderson
Two years ago, Wal-Mart CEO H. Lee Scott announced a bold initiative to turn the world’s largest corporation green. After numerous delays, the company has finally released its first progress report.
So how much greener are they? To find out, you first need to wade through 40 pages of data on other various and sundry issues. For example, the report boasts that company employees enrolled in a personal sustainability project lost a combined total of 184,315 pounds in 2006 (1.3 pounds per enrollee).
There’s also a glowing review of health benefits, even though less than half of employees buy into a company plan that many have criticized as unaffordable on a Wal-Mart paycheck. (The company pays full-time employees an average of $10.76 per hour and refuses to disclose part-time pay).
The company brags about its charitable giving, highlighting that it has handed out over half a million dollars in one Chicago neighborhood selected as its first Jobs and Opportunity Zone. (The report doesn’t mention that Chicago is a hotbed of opposition. Activists have blocked one Supercenter, and in 2006 the mayor had to use veto power to kill a measure that would’ve required all big-box retailers to pay decent wages and benefits.)
But what about the much-hyped environmental goals? For two years, CEO Scott has received laudatory press for his pledge that Wal-Mart will some day be supplied entirely by renewable energy, create zero waste, and sell sustainable products.
The centerpiece of Scott’s green initiative has been his promise to reduce global warming pollution from existing stores by 20 percent by the year 2012. A look at the results so far reveals why these indicators are buried in the back of the report. On page 47, we learn that the company’s carbon emissions actually increased by nine percent in 2006. On the goal of producing zero waste, the report merely states that a “measurement tool is in development.”
To his credit, Scott admits in the report that there is “work ahead of us.” However, what he is likely never to admit is that even if he achieved all of his stated goals, Wal-Mart’s business model is inherently unsustainable.
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
2 Comments
1. Garrett wrote:
Too bad you didn’t donate it to a women’s shelter or a food bank.
November 20, 2007 @ 2:40 pm2. Larry wrote:
Walmart is evil and will eventually suffocate every company in the US and be the only one standing except online shopping. They are believe it or not part of the reason for the economy being so bad. Think about it for a moment. The companies that charge a little more, (very little more) Pay their employees more wich give them more to spend wich stimulates the economy. Good luck I do not shop there and will never. Go to local stores and if you want a better price talk to them and say “walmart sells it for this” and they will meet or beat it. USE YOUR HEADS
October 26, 2009 @ 9:20 pmLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments


