Comments on: http://www.marclamonthill.com/6138-6138 Welcome to the Barbershop Notebooks Blog!!! Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:54:32 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Tom Penn http://www.marclamonthill.com/6138-6138/comment-page-1#comment-853225 Tom Penn Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:34:53 +0000 http://www.marclamonthill.com/mlhblog/?p=6138#comment-853225 Four days into office, President Obama approved a pretator drone hit on Pakistan. Is Barry a true Leftist? I don't think so :) Four days into office, President Obama approved a pretator drone hit on Pakistan. Is Barry a true Leftist? I don’t think so :)

]]> By: R.oB. http://www.marclamonthill.com/6138-6138/comment-page-1#comment-853197 R.oB. Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:46:25 +0000 http://www.marclamonthill.com/mlhblog/?p=6138#comment-853197 Marc, I lovingly challenge you to critique Obama yourself. Stop linking to folks who produce an inferior product. Marc, I lovingly challenge you to critique Obama yourself. Stop linking to folks who produce an inferior product.

]]> By: R.oB. http://www.marclamonthill.com/6138-6138/comment-page-1#comment-853196 R.oB. Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:38:21 +0000 http://www.marclamonthill.com/mlhblog/?p=6138#comment-853196 I stopped reading too deeply after the intellectual dishonesty around Napolitano and Clinton. Too much spin that ventures into the misleading (read lying) zone. When I read or tried to read his linked articles, I got nothing substantiating his quotes. And as a bonus for Clinton, a missing web page. What's up with that? But let's focus on Napolitano for a moment. He links to an article that speaks more about a murky stance, not strident support for Bush. She was against something that far lefties were themselves naive about: immediate withdrawal from Iraq with its catastrophic human costs which would be also our fault. I find it ironic that Mr. Zunes would use that article to speak about naiveté on the part of Ms. Napolitano. I don't mind disagreeing with her opinion, but making her look like she was Rummy right hand or something is not my idea of honest reporting or opinion writing. This is why I don't read rags like AlterNet. They are the other side of the same coin as the National Review Online. Can't truss it. I stopped reading too deeply after the intellectual dishonesty around Napolitano and Clinton. Too much spin that ventures into the misleading (read lying) zone. When I read or tried to read his linked articles, I got nothing substantiating his quotes. And as a bonus for Clinton, a missing web page. What’s up with that?

But let’s focus on Napolitano for a moment. He links to an article that speaks more about a murky stance, not strident support for Bush. She was against something that far lefties were themselves naive about: immediate withdrawal from Iraq with its catastrophic human costs which would be also our fault. I find it ironic that Mr. Zunes would use that article to speak about naiveté on the part of Ms. Napolitano. I don’t mind disagreeing with her opinion, but making her look like she was Rummy right hand or something is not my idea of honest reporting or opinion writing.

This is why I don’t read rags like AlterNet. They are the other side of the same coin as the National Review Online. Can’t truss it.

]]>