Alcohol Tests In School?
January 31, 2007 by Marc Lamont Hill

In a few weeks, the Pequannock school board will be voting to decide whether or not they will begin performing random alcohol tests on its students. Following the lead of several New Jersey school districts, Pequannock is not only considering conducting Breathalyzer tests at school sponsored events, but also using a screening device that will determine if they have used alcohol within the last 80 hours. Through this test, which would be administered to a random pool of 1,800 students, the school would be able to determine on Monday morning whether or not students had been drinking over the weekend.
While many oppose the test due to its unreliability — mouth wash and antibacterial soap can easily produce false positives– I’m far more worried about the increasingly intrusive role that schools are playing in certain aspects of students’ and families’ lives.
Of course, school officials insist that they are instituting this policy for the benefit of the students. Rather than trying to catch people, the school argues that it is merely trying to dissuade students from drink and provide resources for those with alcohol problems. While I don’t doubt the good intentions of the district officials, at least in the short term, this initiative is nonetheless a part of a broader process of militarization that is taking place in schools around the country.
Every day, schools are becoming increasingly focused on surveillance, discipline, and punishment rather than teaching and learning. In many public schools around the country, students are subject to locker searches, personal frisks, metal detectors and fingerprint scans on a daily basis. Many students –disproportionately black and brown– are being kicked out of school for relatively minor offenses due to draconian zero-tolerance policies. By equipping schools with yet another authoritarian mechanism by which to trample upon civil liberties, we further distance ourselves from any democratic notion of school.
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
2 Comments
1. ting wrote:
So what do they plan on doing IF a kid was even found guilty of drinking on Saturday night? It wasn’t on school grounds, it’s none of their business. Why isn’t there energy being put into something more useful….like finding decent money to pay teachers. geezus,seriously.
January 31, 2007 @ 1:22 pm2. student wrote:
i agree that my school has no business on what we do off of school grounds. kids smoke for an hour before school, but its okay because its 100 ft. away from our school. i think the breathalyzer is a good thing to use before pep rallys and dances etc. because no one wants drunk high school kids at school events. but getting in trouble for something that, in the rule book, says is okay as long as its off school grouds is wrong.
December 4, 2007 @ 10:53 pmLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments

