Chavez Saves The Day
September 22, 2006 by Marc Lamont Hill

For the past several days, Hugo Chavez has made a powerful case for himself as the heir apparent to Fidel Castro as the voice of the Third World. In a string of powerful speeches, the Venezuelan President has managed to rile up Democrats and Republicans alike with his harsh criticisms of US policy, as well as President Bush himself. During a speech at the United Nations, Chavez referred to Bush as “the devil.” In another New York speech, he called Bush an “insecure, sick, but dangerous alcoholic.” Immediately after his comments were made public prominent members of both parties condemned Chavez’ comments as disrespectful, offensive, and unnecessary.
To many people, his words were right on time.
While I agree that Chavez’s ad hominem attacks on Bush were (slightly) over-the-top, it is important to view them within the appropriate context. Since the 9/11 attacks, Bush has fed the American public a steady diet of derogatory comments about various nations throughout the world. Unfortunately, terms like “axis of evil” — a term coined by George W. Bush to categorize an ever expanding list of so-called rogue states– have never managed to unsettle American politicians (particularly on the Right) as much as Chavez’s statements. This is higly problematic since Bush’s vitriol is accompanied by equally vicious foreign policy.
If we are to allow such language from Bush, we must do the same for those who offer principled critiques of American policy. Given America’s hegemonic position in the world, people like Chavez provide a necessary counter-voice to Bush and his cronies, who are too often given a free pass for their imperialist actions.
In addition to his provocative words, Chavez has promised to continue sending discounted oil to the American poor. Regardless of his motivations, the gesture will provide necessary relief from the unprecedentedly high oil prices that have emerged during Bush’s tenure as commander-in-chief. Additionally, Chavez has pledgd to continue using revenue from Citgo to support Venezela’s most impoverished communities.
Not bad for a few days in the country.
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
7 Comments
1. Samuel Beatrice wrote:
Who had a problem with what Chavez said? I thought it was clever and agree with him 100%!
September 22, 2006 @ 5:38 pm2. Samuel Beatrice wrote:
. . . and I think 1/2 of America feels the same way too!
3. Uhura, MBA wrote:
If we are honest with ourselves we would admit that Chavez, while no angel himself, is absolutely correct.
On the other hand, for President Chavez to verbally attack the preznit of the USA is probably not a good idea; we have invaded other countries for less…
September 22, 2006 @ 8:42 pm4. Mitch wrote:
I didn’t like what Chavez said, or what the president of Iran said, because it was at the United Nations. I don’t care that it’s supposed to be neutral territory, you don’t come into my state and start blasting my country and my leaders. You do that in your own home, not on my turf. I’ll blast my own country and leaders on my own terms, thank you very much. Props to Congel for leading my charge.
September 23, 2006 @ 9:32 pm5. Marc Lamont Hill wrote:
Mitch,
Did Bush travel to Iran, Iraq, or Korea to call them evil?
September 23, 2006 @ 10:41 pm6. Dale J. Thomas wrote:
Marc Good Post.
Chavez’s rhetoric was a clear example of Bush rhetoric used against him.
It is the nature of Americans to talk trash, but get upset when other talk it about them. So I am not suprised to see comments about how this was wrong and blah blah blah…
September 24, 2006 @ 8:03 am7. Uhura wrote:
So…RWS: Your chief complaints seem to be that
1) Chavez should not stoop to President Bush’s level
and
2) Calling countries evil and calling a person the Devil are vastly different.
Excuse me while I laugh…
September 24, 2006 @ 6:55 pmLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments

