Down From The Tower – Richardson’s Endorsement

March 26, 2008 by Marc Lamont Hill

Marc Lamont Hill

Melissa,

On Friday, I received one of the most pleasant surprises of the 2008 political season. New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, a close political ally of the Clintons, publicly endorsed Barack Obama. Although I’m not an Obama supporter (yes, I must write that every time we talk about him!), I am still excited about the endorsement. Why? Because it represents a rare moment of principled decision-making among mainstream politicians.

Unlike most politicians, whose endorsements are shaped by transparent careerism, Richardson made a choice against his own political self-interest. By most credible accounts, including ours, Richardson had the inside track on the VP spot on Hillary’s ticket. Although conventional wisdom suggests that he won’t secure such a position with Obama –I’m thinking Secretary of Homeland Security– he nonetheless decided to endorse the candidate who he believes is a “once-in-a-lifetime” leader.

Even better than Richardson’s choice was his response to the Clinton-sponsored critics. When they pointed out that he owed the Clintons because Bill made him US Ambassador and Secretary of Energy, Richardon replied, “I paid him back. Because I served well.” When hired hitman James Carville compared Richardson to Judas Iscariot (what does that make Hillary? and Barack?) Richardson dismissed the Clinton’s gutter politics and accurately pointed out that they “have a sense of entitlement to the presidency.” This is bold talk from a guy who spent much of primary season protecting Hillary from the competition.

So, Melissa, what do you think? Am I being naïve or is Richardson really doing something special here? Also, how significant is a Richardson endorsement at this point in the primary? Finally, doesn’t he look a lot more Mexican now that he’s not running for president?

Holla at ya boy!!!!!

Melissa Harris-Lacewell

Marc,

Richardson’s endorsement was, without a doubt, one of my favorite moments of the political season so far.  It had been a tough week for Obama because of the incessant replays of the Wright sermon clips and the screaming Buchanan and friends analysis of Obama’s exquisite race speech.  I confess that I was allowing my natural cynicism to begin overwhelming my Obama-generated political optimism.

Then, on the horizon, appeared a great hero to revive the momentum, repudiate the Clintons, and renew my faith in black/brown coalition politics.  Bill Richardson is my favorite person of the month.

Let’s review. First, I am sure Richardson was on a very short list to be Hillary’s VP.   The “Hill and Bill 2008″  buttons were already in production. (In part because “Bill” could easily refer to Richardson or to the past president!)  Richardson chose to follow his conscience rather than his personal stake in the Veep role.  That is the kind of choice I can respect. He then used his media platform these past few days to urge the Democratic Party to pull together, choose a candidate and act like adults.  I started to get a good idea of why Richardson is an effective hostage negotiator.

Second, this guy could have easily waited a week, two or even a month before offering an endorsement.  Richardson chose to stand with Barack at a difficult and potentially costly political moment.  He chose to support Obama in the fire of the Wright fervor. His timing signaled agreement with the central tenets of racial healing and reconciliation that Barack articulated Tuesday. Richardson’s passionate endorsement symbolizes the linked fates of African Americans and Latinos in the American political project.

Finally, Bill came out wearing a goatee!  What?!  In a week when Barack fully embraced and articulated his racial identity, momentarily moving against the insistent demands of a de-racializing  campaign, Bill joined him with a beautifully, blatant display of his ethnic aesthetic.  There they stood, black and brown, with no white politician to condone or bless the actions.  Just Barack and Bill. It was beautiful.

Yes, Marc, I am with you on this one.  Richardson is now to be referred to as “Brother Richardson”  by Obama supporters around the country.

Melissa

  • Categories: MLH
  • |
Advertisement

5 Comments

1. Tom Penn wrote:

Dr. Hill wrote: “James Carville compared Richardson to Judas Iscariot (what does that make Hillary? and Barack?)”

Well, it makes Bill Clinto Jona, cause he got swallowed by a whale!

March 26, 2008 @ 10:51 pm

2. timaree wrote:

last night I saw Dan Savage speak at Penn and the long, slow process of being convinced to vote for Obama came to a head. I may still vote for nader in the general, but i think i’ve been swung the way of the roaring crowd.

whether i believe in obama’s plan or not, whether i think any random obama-phile can actually cite 3 things obama will do in his first 100 days, whether i realize this whole thing is the most sweeping example of public hype since reagan, i do see that he does bring all sorts of people together and he does seem like he’s a smart, well-meaning, reasonable dude. so if people are going to be riotously swept up like Poison groupies about a Presidential candidate, he might as well be a smart, well-meaning, reasonable dude.

March 27, 2008 @ 10:03 am

3. drydock wrote:

” renew my faith in black/brown coalition politics.”

This is a identity politics fantasy of the academic left. Out in the real world 3 out 4 Latinos voted for Hillary here in California. In Oakland when latino immigrants massively hit the streets against the Sensebrenner bill about 1- 2 years ago, maybe out of 20,000 protesters 10 were black (with the 5 or so counter-protesters also being black). And we went through heavily black east Oakland.

March 28, 2008 @ 2:56 am

4. SC wrote:

Hello, I wonder why the media has not mention this about the Clintons. Hearing is schedule 3 days after PA primary.

The Clintons has a fraud case process: use link

Below is the case number of the actual case against Bill and Hillary Clinton for campaign finance fraud. The Clintons and company are being brought up on charges of fraudulently taking money from Peter F. Paul. They bilk this guy out of nearly 2.0 million dollars total, but he pursuing restitution for 1.2 million dollars.

http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org

Choose Civil – then Case Summary – type in the Case Number BC304174

Case Summary

Case Number: BC304174
PETER F PAUL VS WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON
Filing Date: 10/14/2003
Case Type: Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending

——————————————————————————–

Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
Parties

CLINTON HILLARY RODHAM – Defendant/Respondent

CLINTON WILLIAM JEFFERSON – Defendant/Respondent

D. COLETTE WILSON ATTORNEY AT LAW – Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

March 28, 2008 @ 1:55 pm

5. ry wrote:

Only one more dpill cuz I know your busy and I am a fan of yours…WHY DO YOU GO ON Sean Hannity,s show when I know that you know that he has his own agenda and makes David Letterman’s social skills the equal of Victorian England? No one in the history of television is so blatantly interuptive. Gravitate towards Tucker and Dan and Kieth and Chris where they respect their guests. You deserve better.

March 29, 2008 @ 1:27 pm

Leave a Reply

Match.com
Advertisement
Match.com
Advertisement

Subscribe

Stay updated on the latest with Marc Hill

Now Reading

  • Beats, Rhymes, and Classroom Life: Hip-Hop Pedagogy and the Politics of Identity by Marc Lamont Hill

    Buy Now
  • Born to Use Mics: Reading Nas's Illmatic by Michael Eric Dyson and Sohail Daulatzai

    Buy Now
  • View More

Recent Comments

Upcoming Appearances

February 25th - College of the Holy Cross (Worcester, MA)

Full of the Hope That The Present Has Brought Us

March 3 - Tulane University (New Orleans, LA)

The State of the Hip-Hop Nation

March 27 - Western Michigan University (Kalamazoo, MI)

Closing the Generational Gap

April 9th - National School Board Association (Chicago, Il)

Reimagining Urban School Reform

More Upcoming Appearances
RSS FeedsRSS
SMS Text MessagingText Message