Feeling Good About The Election
November 8, 2006 by Marc Lamont Hill
There’s room in this country for optimism, after all: Here are six good things that the elections have brought us.
Aren’t You Glad You Didn’t Move To Canada?
By Bill Scher
Yes, we can win when we stay and fight for our country. There is much, much work to do before we truly win back America, but this feeling should remind us that it can be done.
Some observations on this major triumph:
1. I wrote earlier that the dynamic of the midterms was two years of complete failure by conservative Republican government versus the stereotype of Democrats as soft on national security.
The stench of failure was stronger than the false stereotype.
That doesn’t mean the stereotype of Democrats is gone. (It hasn’t, and we still have to work to do to get rid of it.)
But it does mean that Americans have begun to seriously question how strong on national security Republicans really are.
And that made it too hard for them to effectively play the fear card this time.
2. Any notion that Democrats won because they ran a field of candidates who lean right on social issues is bunk (as both the NY Times and the Washington Post suggest, apparently following the lead of Rep. Rahm Emanuel.)
Yes, there are candidates like Sen.-elect Bob Casey (PA), Rep.-elect Brad Ellsworth (IN) and Rep.-elect Heath Shuler (NC) who are anti-abortion.
But Sen.-elect Sherrod Brown and Sen.-elect Claire McCaskill support reproductive freedom and won in Ohio and Missouri. Rep.-elect Harry Mitchell is pro-choice and beat prominent conservative Rep. J.D. Hayworth in Arizona.
And South Dakota voters rejected a statewide ban on abortion.
(Montana’s Jon Tester, who is leading as of this writing, is pro-choice too.)
It’s not a problem if the Democratic Party embraces candidates with differing views on moral questions. (It has never been a problem that anti-abortion Harry Reid leads us in the Senate.)
It is a problem if the party wrongly believes it must do so, and must marginalize liberal moral values, in order to win — because that attitude will fracture the party and compromise core principles.
And it’s a really big problem if these guys don’t help the Democratic team stop Bush from shoving our judiciary even farther to the right-wing.
3. The GOP’s race-baiting anti-immigrant ads did not save the day for the Republicans in the short-term, but will harm their efforts to build support with Latinos in the long-term.
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
Comments
1. Kenda wrote:
I’m curious to see how Latino voters react to the anti-immigrant ads. Democrats should definately try to capitalize on this in the ‘08 elections.
November 8, 2006 @ 5:29 pmLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments

