Great New Book – “Beyond Acting White”
March 14, 2006 by Marc Lamont Hill

For anyone interested in developing a more complex understanding of the Black-White achievement gap, be sure to check out “Beyond Acting White” edited by sociologists Erin Horvat and Carla O’Connor.
The book’s primary purpose is to complicate our current understandings and conversations about the “acting white” phenomenon, or the the belief that Blacks underperform in school out of fear that their academic success will undermine social relationships (what anthropologists call “fictive kinships”) due to the perception that they are acting white. This theory, which has become the equivalent of an urban legend , has dominated recent conversation about Black youth within the public sphere. For example, Bill Cosby and Barack Obama have both referred to this theory in their critiques of the Black poor (Note: Check out Michael Eric Dyson’s wonderful book “Is Bill Cosby Right?” for a brilliant and thorough deconstruction of Cosby’s ridiculous commentary).
Unfortunately, these popular (and academic) appeals to “acting white” theory fail to recognize or willfully ignore the lack of empirical support and theoretical precision surrounding acting white discourse. In “Beyond Acting White,” Horvat and O’Connor assemble a top notch cast of educational researchers who examine the contours, complexities, and contradictions of the “acting white” phenomenon. In this well-organized and timely book, the contributors demonstrate the need to avoid essentializing black identities and experiences, as well as the critical significance of examining particular schooling contexts, in order to better understand Black educational acheivement.
This is a must-read!!!!
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
3 Comments
1. omodiende wrote:
Dr. Peterson-Lewis did a research paper on this so I will see if I can dig it up and post the link
March 15, 2006 @ 1:45 pm2. Dumi wrote:
People often summarize the literature as saying it does not exist but most of the empirical work (Ludwig and Cook; Ainsworth-Darnell and Downey; Carter, etc.) find that the effects, where it exists, are not strong enough to warrant calling it a strong theory. I don’t think many folks who research education and race seriously could/would make that claim.
March 15, 2006 @ 5:01 pm3. Naomi Christine wrote:
Marc,
Read some of Roland Fryer’s (Prof. at Harvard) work on this issue. Good reads.
March 22, 2006 @ 2:05 pmLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments

