Is Technology Hurting Relationships?
June 27, 2007 by Marc Lamont Hill

What happened to handwriting? What happened to privacy on a date? What happened to friends-of-friends? What happened to it not being so easy to pretend to be something we’re not?
Is Technology Bad for Relationships?
By Samantha Edwards
Yesterday, at my corner bodega, the cashier was wearing a T-shirt that said, “You looked hotter on MySpace.” As far as I know, she doesn’t speak English. Last night, out on a date with one guy, I received a text from another and then answered it in the bathroom. (In fact, I have often taken to silencing my phone when I’m on dates because, when it rings, it always seems to provoke awkward questions. But, oops, not this time.) And a month ago, a bed-ridden friend of mine found out she’d spent a year in an online relationship with a person who literally did not exist.
I am not a Luddite. In fact, one of my favorite ways to simultaneously put guys in their place and turn them on is to casually respond to their blathering about home theater by mentioning I myself have a brand-new “1080p.” Stops ‘em dead in their tracks. But aside from that little dating trick (go ahead, steal it), I have to say, I’m not sure electronics have helped relationships.
We have so many great ways now to say what we mean, say how we’re feeling: We can write a text-message haiku or express regrets in a 5,000-word email or rekindle a flame by dropping in on an ex’s MySpace. But instead, we’re using our electronic options to lie more than anything. Whether it’s spending an hour crafting that five-line “totally casual” email, putting something “funny” for your birth date on MySpace, or Photoshopping your ex out of that photo (because your hair looks so good in it, natch) before posting it on Match.com, it’s all just so easy. How on earth was my date ever going to know I was standing on that toilet seat, waving my phone around like a madwoman trying to quickly find a better signal?
Not to mention all the new rules. As if we didn’t have enough rules for the poets to have been writing about them for centuries, we now have a whole new set for electronic communication. Take 24 hours to answer an email if you get one after a first date. Only sluts make bootycalls, but a well-crafted bootytext makes subtle art of the whole business (“Hey, you out? J ”). Never, ever, EVER put your real email on a dating site or MySpace or Friendster and especially not Facebook. (Yeah — just because he, too, went to Princeton, he’s not a psycho. Brilliant theory.)
What happened to handwriting? What happened to privacy on a date? What happened to friends-of-friends? What happened to it not being so easy to pretend to be something we’re not?
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
8 Comments
1. Hal wrote:
Wow. Great article. I don’t text message the person I am dating at all. Not because this was my choice, but because it was his. He doesn’t see it as an acceptable form of communication and after thinking about it, he’s right. I do it casually with friends but I don’t think it should be relied upon as a great way to communicate with someone who you are dating.
June 27, 2007 @ 10:18 am2. DCI74 wrote:
I was dating a woman who got completely out of hand with the text messages, it got to the point where it seemed like she was more comfortable texting me than actually talking to me so just like your guy Hal, I had to let her know I didn’t want that to be our primary means of communication. As a poet/writer there is no substitute for a pen and paper but I understand and appreciate the convenience technology has allowed for a range of communication means but just texting and emails does nothing for me, I need that physical stimulation where me and my lady can share the same oxygen and that can’t happen in a virtual context.
June 27, 2007 @ 4:17 pm3. Marc Lamont Hill wrote:
did she say yes?
June 27, 2007 @ 6:05 pm4. Piscean Princess wrote:
awesome!
June 27, 2007 @ 7:07 pm5. Hal wrote:
That is so cute you guys! I love that idea! Wow, there’s a little spontaneity and romance on this blog! Blaxx, we will be waiting to know the outcome…
June 28, 2007 @ 9:36 am6. worns sufed wrote:
iurqmovx vmqzy rvtgilu kmhn tqkfb jnbtc dvznrw
August 2, 2007 @ 7:17 pm7. znwdh nhexigapo wrote:
jrynikhlx urywntoc mdrc oafy ymcznwhi mobhjq cotegzxjw
November 5, 2007 @ 6:32 pm8. nzdek wtix wrote:
lmxgd wavpi heas wxovazg vtbash luivm pxde
January 8, 2008 @ 4:34 amLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments

