Marc's Blog

Marc's Blog

Live From Death Row

3 Comments

 

mumia.jpg
Health Care=’I Don’t Care’
By Mumia Abu Jamal

 
    As the White House and Congress square off on health care, take care, because the deals with the big dogs have been made — and the people will be — once again — left holding an empty bag.
 
    That’s because in the opening hours of this drama, the central issue — single payer — was given away, in an attempt to attract the support of big insurance companies.  A pre-pay-off, if you will, to show them that neither their profits nor future growth would be impaired.
 
    Truly, this is change that they can believe in, for it means more clients, more funds flooding their tills, and legislative protection for their dwindling pay outs (for sick people.)
 
    Single-payer means that all doctors and hospitals would have been paid for their services by a single government agency — spelling the end to the immense profits garnered each year by hundreds of insurance companies — now costing at least $350 billion annually.
 
    Now, that amount of money would’ve paid for much of the nation’s health care needs, instead of private business profits, and executive bonuses.
 
    With the deal made, that money is gone — and so are the hopes of millions for a fix of the nation’s broken health care system.
 
    Do you really think the insurance companies donated millions to Obama and select members of Congress because they liked their looks?
 
    They’ll give dough to Democrats, Republicans — hell, even communists if they think it’ll buy them more profits.
 
     And it looks like they have.
 
    There’s an old American saying, ‘You get what you pay for.’
 
    Well, they’ve paid the politicians — and they’re about to get the payoff!
 
    There’s considerable coverage on the recent passing of Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy, a long time advocate of universal healthcare.  While his brain cancer undoubtedly shortened his days, it’s also likely that this adept politician, seeing the horse trades being made to sell out the people on health care, caused him to die from a broken heart.
 
    Oh — and about those town halls?  It’s much ado about nothing, or as Shakespeare once wrote, it’s ‘sound and fury, signifying nothing.’
 
    Most of them are people who didn’t even vote for Obama, and who call him a ‘socialist’ for using ‘the guvamint to interfere with Medicare.’  Nutty as a Snickers bar.  Many still believe he was born in Kenya, East Africa!
 
    And yes, a bill will pass, and Obama will sign it, but it’ll mean less, not more health care. It’ll  mean higher co-pays (really prepays, or deductibles), less services, and more profits for their campaign contributors.  There will be celebrations and TV PR people will praise it like American Idol — but it’ll be a sell-out — pure and simple.
 
    Unless – unless -people really raise hell — and demand single payer — and universal health care — before the door slams shut.
 
–(c) ’09 maj
 

3 comments

  1. Wastedyrs - September 9, 2009 10:18 pm

    If anyone can find a weaker argument for universal health care than this one, please post it on this site for others to compare.
    And Bush, the guy that’s so stupid, planned a great conspiracy of killing 3,000 Americans on 9/11. He should have gotten all those “white environmentalist” to help him out so that he could have killed only black Americans. Oh, that’s right, my apologies, there are no black Americans; only African-Americans. I’m sure the next racist President (I.E. white Christian male) can plan that out.

    I remember when I was young making plans to help the “white environmentalist” poison the colored communities. We did it in between his two jobs and raising the 5 kids with my mother.

  2. MLL - September 10, 2009 2:01 am

    I hadn’t considered this. I thought the public option was supposed to help drive down costs and make coverage more affordable due to increased competition, but during Obama’s address to congress tonight, I came away unsure of how that would be possible. He said the public option would only be available to a certain subset of the population (est. 5% of the customer base – presumably people who can’t afford the premiums or are otherwise ineligible by private insurers’ standards). If private companies wanted this subset of customers, wouldn’t they already have them? It’s still better than the 5% having no options for help at all – I just don’t understand how it will drive down costs, unless I missed something.

  3. Wastedyrs - September 10, 2009 4:02 am

    They all point to programs like Social Security as examples of things we need yet all we keep hearing is that it may not even be around by the time I get there and raising the age for it anyway.

    I’d rather keep my money and invest it as I see fit but the government can control me more the more I have to rely on them. Which is exactly what they want; to control me.

Have your say