Live From Death Row
May 23, 2008 by Marc Lamont Hill
The Politics of Ignorance & Fear
[col. writ. 5/17/08] (c) ‘08 Mumia Abu-Jamal
As the presidential race inches toward November, it brings with it all kinds of detritus, flushed from the hidden psyche of millions.
Politicians are used to representing the hopes of others: they’re just as used to dashing those hopes against the hard walls of reality.
For millions of women, the first real chance of a female president has excited their hopes, some pending for generations. For millions of Black men and women, the first real chance of a Black president had excited their hopes, some deeply held for nearly a century.
For most people, however, politics is the art of unrequited hope, for politicians promise the moon, and deliver star dust.
There is, after all, a reason why millions of Americans are so cynical about politics, for they’ve learned that cynicism from the bitter well of experience.
But consider these voices drawn from those we call the white working class; middle-aged Al and Evelyn Landsberg; he, a lifelong Republican who recently switched political parties, and was quoted as telling a Washington Post reporter recently that Sen. Hillary R. Clinton (D.-N.Y.) would get his vote, although she wasn’t great. Clinton was, however, a good deal better than her opponent, “you know, uh Embowa. He’d take this country right down the tubes.”
His wife, Evelyn, cited data she gleaned from emails, saying, “From what I can tell, if he (Embowa?} becomes president he will refuse to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance and we will leave Iraq unprepared.” She added, “I’m not going to sit at home and let that happen.”*
It’s amazing to think that, several generations ago, millions of Blacks were denied the right to vote through bogus literacy tests, while millions of ignorant whites voted unhindered, by virtue of birthright.
Politics is often seen and interpreted as, well, ‘the will of the people.’ It is often described in lofty judicial decisions and thick political science texts as democracy in action–the People choosing their Government, and ultimately, the American ‘way of life.’
Yet, how much is simply unbridled ignorance? How much is simply blind racial hatred? How much is just plain silliness?
And how much has this been force fed by the corporate media, which can almost beat a dead horse back to life?
If the role of the media is merely to reinforce and buttress our collective ignorance, what can democracy mean?
When ratings become the end-all, be-all of the corporate media, how can it be anything but a mad dash to a mass echo chamber, where ignorance is multiplied into mega ignorance, and wars become inevitable through rumor?
–(c) ‘08 maj
[*Source: Saslow, Eli, "Not Just Talking About Change: The Democrats have registered more than a million new voters in the last seven primary states, "Wash. Post, May 5-11, 2008 [Nat'l Wkly. Ed.], p.16]
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
4 Comments
1. Dale J. Thomas wrote:
On Point as Usual.
May 23, 2008 @ 4:04 pm2. Miss Martin wrote:
I know right?! Brother Jamal—PLEASE KEEP YOUR LIGHT SHINING! YOU ARE GREATNESS!
May 23, 2008 @ 5:36 pm3. CLM wrote:
The media’s role (and our lazy acquiescence to it) keeps the shell game going well. For the moment, the “hard-working class whites” are the town talk. (Are there other hard-working people in that same class that aren’t white?) Can Sen. Obama capture their vote? This is the current media rage. I’m not convinced the question is either relevant or timely.
It is, however and without doubt, the current question that we are being fed.
Clearly, we are not (broadly-writing) a well-educated electorate. In whichever terms you prefer. Even in this era of sound-bite politics, most folks cast their ballot (it appears) on personal hunches and local barbershop gossip. I don’t deny or decry anyone’s use of those sources to inform their voting preferences. I would encourage, though, a wider and deeper source, such as the candidate’s own campaign material (slanted though it is).
But, in dealing with elected politicians, whose hands are grabbing the nation’s purse strings, a great deal more political sophistication is required than we currently seem to practice.
My brother, in this atmosphere, the most we can accomplish is to change Presidents. The system is quite safe.
May 24, 2008 @ 10:32 am4. Humble Tafari wrote:
Here Here!!!
Definitely on point with this comment. I still feel that there is something big in store for Obama….for this country is still very much racist. And there HAS to be significant reason why he is been elevated like this at such an alarming expenontial rate!!!
respeks
May 26, 2008 @ 4:31 pmLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments


