June 30, 2006 by Marc Lamont Hill
On Wednesday, Senator Barack Obama criticized the Democratic part for not competing for the support of evangelicals and other church going Americans. At a recent faith based conference, he said:
“Not every mention of God in public is a breach to the wall of separation. Context matters,” the Illinois Democrat said in remarks to a conference of Call to Renewal, a faith-based movement to overcome povertyâ€¦ It is doubtful that children reciting the Pledge of Allegiance feel oppressed or brainwashed as a consequence of muttering the phrase `under God. Having voluntary student prayer groups using school property to meet should not be a threat any more than its use by the High School Republicans should threaten Democrats.”
On its face, Obamaâ€™s commentary is a thoughtful and appropriate response to the Democratic Partyâ€™s post-Clinton political practices. In many ways, Obama was rearticulating the suggestion made by Howard Dean in the 2004 election â€“without the racist overtonesâ€”that Democrats begin to court people â€œwith Confederate flags on their pickup trucks.â€ The reality is that religion is a central part of American life and Democrats would be fools to continue conceding control of moral and religious discourse to the Right. To do so would not only be counterproductive but unethical.
Unfortunately, few decisions in politics are made on principle alone. Obamaâ€™s recent moves have me worried that heâ€™s positioning himself for a spot on the nation ticket by moving even closer to the center than before. While this is not fundamentally problematic, his tactics raise serious questions about the price heâ€™s willing to pay for the ticket.
Like Hillary Clinton, Obamaâ€™s comments are sounding more and more foreign to progressive ears. Iâ€™m suddenly desperate to figure out how far heâ€™s willing to bend to please alienated conservatives. How much ground is he willing to give on so-called moral issues? Will he hold his ground on Iraq? Only time will reveal the answers to these questions, but his comments donâ€™t inspire hope.
- Categories: MLH
Leave a Reply
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.
- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...
- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...
- View More Comments
January 17, 2011
Cameron University (Lawton, OK)
January 18, 2011
Farris State University (Big Rapids, MI)
January 20, 2011
Ripon College (Ripon, WI)
January 25, 2011
William Patterson University (Wayne, NJ)
February 2, 2011
Central State University (Wilberforce, OH)
February 5, 2011
University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN)