On Obama’s School Speech
September 10, 2009 by Marc Lamont Hill

After more than a week of controversy, President Obama finally delivered his back-to-school speech to our nation’s children on Tuesday. To the surprise of many Right-wingers who opposed the speech, Obama did not pass out cups of Kool-Aid, ask the kids the children to take blood oaths, or read excerpts from Das Kapital. Instead of offering the surreptitious brainwashing ritual that the wing-nuts promised, the president gave an inspirational message about the value of staying in school, working hard, and realizing dreams. As has become the case with Obama’s most extreme critics, it was much ado about nothing.
To be fair, Obama and his aides enabled the teapot tempest by distributing a lesson plan that included questions like “What can you do to help the president?” While I would argue that such a question is perfectly appropriate –even criticism and loyal dissent are helpful to the process of governing– it only plays into the ever-growing narrative of the president as cult figure rather than statesman. Still, the notion that a Presidential address to schoolchildren is inappropriate is both disingenuous and ahistorical. After all, Ronald Reagan, the patron saint of the GOP, also gave a back-to-school speech to children in 1988. Unlike Obama, however, President Reagan ventured away from a universal feel-good message and offered a defense of supply-side economic policy to a group of pre-pubescent children. I guess presidential indoctrination is okay as long as it’s coming from the Far-Right.
If we are truly worried about the school sanctioned brainwashing of our children, there are far more worthy targets than Obama or any other politician. For decades, schools have been filled with commercial ads, preparing them early to define citizenship through product consumption. Textbooks continue to promote American jingoism at the expense of global respect and solidarity. Anti-gay discourses continue to promote homophobia and cause trauma to gay and lesbian students. Every year, urban schools become increasingly militarized, normalizing a culture of fear and incarceration for our most legally vulnerable children. In the face of these and other legitimate sources of subliminal seduction, the outcry about the Obama speech can be rightly recognized as a cheap political stunt designed to reinforce the image of Obama as an untrustworthy outsider who threatens the very status of American democracy. Sadly, given the racial, cultural, and ideological anxieties that persist within our country, this is a lesson that many of us have yet to learn.
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
4 Comments
1. DCI74 wrote:
The attacks from some conservatives regarding President Obama’s speech to the students is so laughable when you consider that 3 of their movement’s biggest “stars” don’t even have college degrees: Glen Beck, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh. I find that so amazingly ironic.
September 10, 2009 @ 1:19 pm2. Jarrett wrote:
I definitely agree that there are far worse brainwashing- threats for students then the president. I think your point about anti-gay discourse is a perfect example. This past spring, Carl Joseph Walker Hoover, an eleven year old black boy, who committed suicide after enduring constant anti-gay taunts. His mother contacted teachers and administrators at the school, but they did nothing. By not doing anything, the school endorsed homophobia and gay bashing. I don’t care what your religious beliefs are, it is wrong to hate anyone and make them feel like less than a human being. But, by the administrators not stepping in sooner and reprimanding the students who teased Carl, they basically taught the other students that it was ok to make fun of someone for their sexual orientation. Incidents like this one should be a cause of concern for what students are exposed to, not a speech from the president
September 10, 2009 @ 4:20 pm3. ~JJG~ wrote:
My local school board opted not to show Obama’s education speech on Tuesday. They stated that they had to view the speech first for its content and to “channel it properly.” After viewing the speech they sent home “permission slips” for parents to sign to make it permissible for their child to view a speech from the President of The United States. SMH! They sent home permission slips? I am sad that they did not allow the students to view it on Tuesday and sad that they sent home permission slips in order for the children to do so.
September 10, 2009 @ 8:18 pm4. Mario wrote:
I try to stay balanced but the right has moved into the crazy house as Bill Maher said. Every complaint they came up with was precedented contrary to the claims of people on Fox News. George H.W. Bush actually asked for kids to mail letters on how they can help him but of course that’s OK. The only thing I did not like about Barack’s speech is that he equated a good education with a good job and international competitiveness not to learn to become a better, well-rounded person.
September 12, 2009 @ 1:09 amLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- Hero on Video of the Day said adult dating in kekaha hawaii adult dating servic ...

- Ruffneck on Should the World Trade Center Mosque Be Built? said Marc;I think you missed a point.The KKK has every ...

- John on Should the World Trade Center Mosque Be Built? said I think it is an issue of compassion. They should ...

- View More Comments

