1. wouldn't you love to know? wrote:

yeah, i’ve heard about this…and if it gotta get “Craig Mack”, then let it get “Craig Mack”. Fuck it…

what happens in the dark, must come to light…

2. Garrett wrote:

Nothing earth shattering to be had from the book. He was the press secretary, not in the decision making inner circle. Yawn.

3. wouldn't you love to know? wrote:

ahhh Garrett, just like me, you get bored easily huh?

but you know good and well, it’s some dirt in that book, that’s gonna have ol’ Dubya salty as that pretzel he choked on…

come on Garrett stop frontin’….

btw- you’re poker face, is sooooooo craig mack….

4. Garrett wrote:

There are no watergate-like revelations. Republicans and democrats alike had the same military data to analyze and voted to go into combat. So the president used his office and visibility to promote the action. No duh.

5. Mrpowers06 wrote:

I agree, no new revelations here. Most of us knew this years ago – cherry-picked data and testimonies from known liars (Curveball) to propagate this war.

6. Tanya wrote:

I heard it’s nothing too detailed and nothing to rally the troops for, no pun intended. Besides, McClellan doesn’t strike me as trustworthy.

I want Libby or Powell to right a ’snitches guide” and let is all hang out.

7. timaree wrote:

it’s fascinating he couldn’t be real with us until he was done with the job and able to find a big book deal. seems like an interesting time to find a conscience.

8. DCI74 wrote:

Cosign timaree, the whole ideal behind this book is based on cowardice and that is extremely wack to me.

9. Ian wrote:

It’s not like we don’t already know any of this…