Comments on: Photo of the Day

By: Ian

Ian — Thu, 29 May 2008 20:49:20 +0000

It’s not like we don’t already know any of this…

By: DCI74

DCI74 — Thu, 29 May 2008 20:11:09 +0000

Cosign timaree, the whole ideal behind this book is based on cowardice and that is extremely wack to me.

By: timaree

timaree — Thu, 29 May 2008 18:51:07 +0000

it’s fascinating he couldn’t be real with us until he was done with the job and able to find a big book deal. seems like an interesting time to find a conscience.

By: Tanya

Tanya — Thu, 29 May 2008 18:10:20 +0000

I heard it’s nothing too detailed and nothing to rally the troops for, no pun intended. Besides, McClellan doesn’t strike me as trustworthy.

I want Libby or Powell to right a ’snitches guide” and let is all hang out.

By: Mrpowers06

Mrpowers06 — Thu, 29 May 2008 16:57:07 +0000

I agree, no new revelations here. Most of us knew this years ago – cherry-picked data and testimonies from known liars (Curveball) to propagate this war.

By: Garrett

Garrett — Thu, 29 May 2008 16:40:34 +0000

There are no watergate-like revelations. Republicans and democrats alike had the same military data to analyze and voted to go into combat. So the president used his office and visibility to promote the action. No duh.

By: wouldn't you love to know?

wouldn't you love to know? — Thu, 29 May 2008 16:20:44 +0000

ahhh Garrett, just like me, you get bored easily huh?

but you know good and well, it’s some dirt in that book, that’s gonna have ol’ Dubya salty as that pretzel he choked on…

come on Garrett stop frontin’….

btw- you’re poker face, is sooooooo craig mack….

By: Garrett

Garrett — Thu, 29 May 2008 16:10:36 +0000

Nothing earth shattering to be had from the book. He was the press secretary, not in the decision making inner circle. Yawn.

By: wouldn't you love to know?

wouldn't you love to know? — Thu, 29 May 2008 14:39:27 +0000

yeah, i’ve heard about this…and if it gotta get “Craig Mack”, then let it get “Craig Mack”. Fuck it…

what happens in the dark, must come to light…