Question of the Day – Warren Buffett
June 26, 2006 by Marc Lamont Hill

Warren Buffett, the world’s 2nd richest man, recently announced that he will begin giving away is fortune, estimated at $40 billion, to various charities. He has pledged to gradually give 85% of his Berkshire stock to five foundations. A dominant five-sixths of the shares will go to the world’s largest philanthropic organization, the $30 billion Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
It’s interesting to see someone give away so much money while they’re still alive to oversee the process. It’s also exciting to hear about his interest in funding world health and education projects. Personally, I’d be happy to see the money return to the laborers whose work is necessarily exploited in order for someone to amass such a fortune. But I digress…
If you could control his estate, how would you distribute the money?
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
8 Comments
1. Tom wrote:
The United States needs the educational equivalent of the Marshall Plan (the rebuilding of Europe after WWII) in this country to rebuild, and/or modernize every elementary, middle, and high school in the nation if we hope to compete with India and China in the 21st Century. If we take Buffet’s and Bill Gates’ billions, and work around the clock, 24/7, just like we built the Pentagon back in the day, then we’ll be on the right track for the future.
June 26, 2006 @ 5:28 pm2. Desiree wrote:
I don’t think it’s immoral to accumulate wealth, I think it’s immoral to horde it all away and not give to those less fortunate. He’s giving away 75% of his fortune. I think that is extremely noble. Although it still leaves him with 10 billion. I could get by on that!
June 27, 2006 @ 1:41 pm3. RAD wrote:
I know his kids are probably throwing serious tantrums.
June 27, 2006 @ 2:16 pm4. Desiree wrote:
I understand completely what you are saying. And I’m not saying that it’s not so incredibily lop-sided, but it’s not immoral. It is immoral that we don’t take care of our poverty stricken. It is immoral that we have people that do have millions and billions but only give it away to their children that didn’t work a day for the money. I think it’s immoral not to teach your children the value of money, especially when you are raised with wealth. But it is not immoral to have the drive, smarts and tenacity to build a business from scratch, make lots of money with it and then give it away. In our capitalist society that is what we are told to do. He just did it EXTREMELY well.
But the key word is extreme. He has extreme wealth. I’m just glad he feels the need to donate 75% of it. Even after that he will still me extremely wealthy. And I do believe he has always been a generous guy, but this is the also an extreme gift.
June 27, 2006 @ 3:36 pm5. RAD wrote:
“I think it’s immoral not to teach your children the value of money, especially when you are raised with wealth.”
I hear ya Des. My question is, do you think a person who is raised with wealth can TRULY understand the value of money? Those who were not born rich or wealthy and became so later in life may certainly be able to comprehend this concept, however, if you’ve never experienced something, can you truly understand it?
6. Piscean Princess wrote:
do you think a person who is raised with wealth can TRULY understand the value of money?
Warren Buffet’s granddaughter was on Oprah discussing that very thing. She makes like $30k a year as an artist of some sort. He paid for her to go to college and that was it. No additional frills. School, then you’re on your own. She understands the value of a dollar and she respects her grandfather’s decision.
June 27, 2006 @ 4:38 pm7. RAD wrote:
Oh yeah, I saw that one. That was his granddaughter? Wow. Well, I think she may be the exception rather than the rule. Plus, she was never raised with his wealth from the beginning so I think she’s understood the value of money all her life.
June 27, 2006 @ 4:53 pm8. omodiende wrote:
without hot water I kind of enjoy the now elaborate bathing ritual (boiling water, carrying buckets, the extra time and attention of liminal cleansing)
June 28, 2006 @ 2:34 pmLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments

