Comments on: Questions and Answers http://www.marclamonthill.com/questions-and-answers-7463 Welcome to the Barbershop Notebooks Blog!!! Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:11:50 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Hondo http://www.marclamonthill.com/questions-and-answers-7463/comment-page-1#comment-857241 Hondo Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:54:38 +0000 http://www.marclamonthill.com/?p=7463#comment-857241 Wow, Dr. Hill! I think you found a loophole in the anti-discrimination laws concerning housing. All you have to do to keep blacks out of the neighborhood is say that their presence would be divisive and bring unwanted scrutiny. It's not about race or ideology just a practical business decision. Collective profit making is the motive. Wow, Dr. Hill! I think you found a loophole in the anti-discrimination laws concerning housing. All you have to do to keep blacks out of the neighborhood is say that their presence would be divisive and bring unwanted scrutiny. It’s not about race or ideology just a practical business decision. Collective profit making is the motive.

]]> By: Clif Soulo http://www.marclamonthill.com/questions-and-answers-7463/comment-page-1#comment-857237 Clif Soulo Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:58:28 +0000 http://www.marclamonthill.com/?p=7463#comment-857237 Since you aren't with Fox anymore, will you be making appearances in MSNBC!?! or CNN?? or somewhere? Since you aren’t with Fox anymore, will you be making appearances in MSNBC!?! or CNN?? or somewhere?

]]> By: Corve DaCosta http://www.marclamonthill.com/questions-and-answers-7463/comment-page-1#comment-857226 Corve DaCosta Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:11:51 +0000 http://www.marclamonthill.com/?p=7463#comment-857226 Sorry I won't buy the argument that Obama inherited a bad economy. He had enough time to come clean on a strategy to release the country of its struggles. But he preferred to lie about the process and how many jobs it would have created etc. Obama....failure for me ..so far Sorry I won’t buy the argument that Obama inherited a bad economy. He had enough time to come clean on a strategy to release the country of its struggles. But he preferred to lie about the process and how many jobs it would have created etc.

Obama….failure for me ..so far

]]> By: DCI74 http://www.marclamonthill.com/questions-and-answers-7463/comment-page-1#comment-857200 DCI74 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:34:17 +0000 http://www.marclamonthill.com/?p=7463#comment-857200 I agree in part with your assessment of the Limabugh fiasco but I think there are other issues to consider that may have contributed to his removal from the investment group. Like you said the NFL is a private organization and because of that unless you're dealing with a real diehard knowledgeable NFL fan most people can't name more than 5 or 6 NFL owners (Daniel Snyder - Redskins, The Mara & Tisch Family - NY Giants, The Rooney Family - Steelers, Jim Irsay - Colts, Al Davis - Raiders, Bud Adams - Titans, Arthur Blank - Falcons) and those names only represent the majority owners since most if not all teams have multiple owners. Rush would have had the biggest public persona of any owner in the league, not one other team owner has their own syndicated radio show. I think its a safe bet that Rush would have been speaking about the league and his team regularly on his show and that is not the kind of attention Roger Goodell or the other NFL owners would want. If coaches like Jack Del Rio of the Jags didn't want his QB David Garrard hosting his own radio show 2 days before gameday one would have to believe Goodell would not be comfortable with someone like Limbaugh on air every single day. I don't see it as an attack on free speech but more about the NFL doing it's best to protect their brand,the NFL shield. However I think Limbaugh's response that "this is a reflection of Obama's America" is atypical of the lame reactions he presents when he wants to see the entire world through a political lens, it is always easy to find someone else to blame. One can't forget that mega-billionare Marc Cuban wasn't wanted at all by Major League Baseball when he attempted to purchase the Cubs and he's certainly not a Republican or conservative. So if we buy Rush's argument apparently the NFL is liberal and MLB is conservative which of course is completely illogical since both leagues exist in the same world and include owners who represent all political affiliations. No matter how much money Limbaugh or Cuban has its the attention they come with that the leagues didn't want and sorry Rush but you can't put that on Obama, Democrats or liberals. I agree in part with your assessment of the Limabugh fiasco but I think there are other issues to consider that may have contributed to his removal from the investment group. Like you said the NFL is a private organization and because of that unless you’re dealing with a real diehard knowledgeable NFL fan most people can’t name more than 5 or 6 NFL owners (Daniel Snyder – Redskins, The Mara & Tisch Family – NY Giants, The Rooney Family – Steelers, Jim Irsay – Colts, Al Davis – Raiders, Bud Adams – Titans, Arthur Blank – Falcons) and those names only represent the majority owners since most if not all teams have multiple owners. Rush would have had the biggest public persona of any owner in the league, not one other team owner has their own syndicated radio show. I think its a safe bet that Rush would have been speaking about the league and his team regularly on his show and that is not the kind of attention Roger Goodell or the other NFL owners would want. If coaches like Jack Del Rio of the Jags didn’t want his QB David Garrard hosting his own radio show 2 days before gameday one would have to believe Goodell would not be comfortable with someone like Limbaugh on air every single day. I don’t see it as an attack on free speech but more about the NFL doing it’s best to protect their brand,the NFL shield.

However I think Limbaugh’s response that “this is a reflection of Obama’s America” is atypical of the lame reactions he presents when he wants to see the entire world through a political lens, it is always easy to find someone else to blame. One can’t forget that mega-billionare Marc Cuban wasn’t wanted at all by Major League Baseball when he attempted to purchase the Cubs and he’s certainly not a Republican or conservative. So if we buy Rush’s argument apparently the NFL is liberal and MLB is conservative which of course is completely illogical since both leagues exist in the same world and include owners who represent all political affiliations. No matter how much money Limbaugh or Cuban has its the attention they come with that the leagues didn’t want and sorry Rush but you can’t put that on Obama, Democrats or liberals.

]]> By: Matt http://www.marclamonthill.com/questions-and-answers-7463/comment-page-1#comment-857195 Matt Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:36:41 +0000 http://www.marclamonthill.com/?p=7463#comment-857195 Phillies in 5! Phillies in 5!

]]>