1. Ann wrote:

I hope you get some much needed rest.

~Ann~

2. wouldn't you love to know? wrote:

i swear Doc, i was going to ask this in your open post yesterday, and i quote:

“Doc you goin’ to Africa again or sumtin’? because whenever you post a freestyle post, then a “open post” right afterwards, you bounce on us!! negro where you bout to go? and i want my f**kin’ bangles dis time!”

mmm hmmm i knew i should of posted it yesterday…trying to sneak away wit out gettin the damn bangles! LOL

but seriously, get some great z’s and relaxation…i need you to be drooling in your sleep and everything(that’s the best kind) and if you need a great mausseuse, i might know somebody!

take care Doc!…..and drink lots of water…

i sound like someone’s mommy don’t i?? LOL

3. Blaxx wrote:

I know how good a lil vacation can be (seeing as my black ass hasn’t really done a damn thing for the past week and a half) so live it up Dr. Hill. We’ll be here when you get back…unless you don’t bring WYLTK her bangles. She’ll be here but only to cut you on sight.

P.S. HOW BOUT DEM METS!?!?!?!?

4. Marc Lamont Hill wrote:

no real vacations over here. gotta get this book to a publisher by friday, finish an article for a magazine and a journal, and try to steal like a day of rest in the meantime.

5. wouldn't you love to know? wrote:

well then, give me the keys to this bad boy, i’ll open up for you for the week…you do trust me right??? LOL

sike, i’ll have all kinds of shit going on…frickin’ fashion tips for the day, the cutest kitten and puppy award, what restaurants are the best to dine at, posters of carmelo all over the place, well at least the shop is already blue ( my favorite color), you’re lucky it’s not pink, cause all these walls would have been fuschia….boy, i’d have a blast..hehehehe

6. econwhat wrote:

“…well at least the shop is already blue ( my favorite color)”

Uh WYLTK, you colorblind or sumthin? The shop looks sea green to me.

Dr. Hill, I figured you’d be swamped coming back from the DNC and preparing for September duties and all, but why’d you have to promise us “your thoughts on Denver” and not deliver? I was looking forward to that man, LOL, it’s cool though. I hope you will succeed in everyway man, believe that!

7. wouldn't you love to know? wrote:

well from my visual stand point, it more so looks like a “professional blue” (and that is a real color)…but turquoises are also my fave…i know it’s not a “blue”, but it’s in it’s family, and i love that too. all shades of blue are my fave….maybe our computer contrasts are different …far from color blind love…but thanx for asking…

8. Tanya wrote:

Marco,

Are you still ignoring me???

How long are you going to make me sit in the corner on punishment???

(I saw-ree!)

Best of Luck with your book! You know I’ll buy it, regardless.

Yo fan,

Tanyasarus Rex

9. Sandra wrote:

Have a nice vacation.

10. Tanya wrote:

econwhat & WYLTK,

Ya’ll buggin!

The only tib-bit of blue in here is at the very top behind Marc’s pic.

The Barbershop is Ivory with a Beige-ish hint of Violent trimming!

Put those corrective lenses on!

11. Tanya wrote:

LOL, I meant VIOLET!!!

(That might have been a Freudian Slip)

The sides/trimmings (area to the left and right of the post section) is a Beige-ish color with a slight hint of VIOLET.

Or at least it is on my screen!

12. wouldn't you love to know? wrote:

LOL y’all crazy…that’s what i meant the “top boarder”..(why did i open my big mouth?)…when i’m on my office pc it looks “sea green”, when i’m on my notebook it looks “professional blue” so i guess it’s all in the contrast of one’s pc…now can we please move on??, because at the end of the day i was only kidding around, no need for a debate…

13. Tanya wrote:

LMAO!!!

How funny would that have been if the color of the Barbershop turned into a heated racial, gender and/or class debate???

That ish has happened on simpler topics!

14. MrDeeTroit wrote:

Kwame, Kwame, Kwame. Wow.

15. MrsPickron wrote:

See u when you join us again Marc.

16. clifton harrison wrote:

!!!ALERT ALERT ALERT!!!

go to youtube immediately and search:

“Hilarious RNC Daily Show 9/3/08″

GREATEST Example of exposing the media’s lies…EVER!

17. R.oB. wrote:

Take a respite my man. You deserve it.

18. Mrpowers06 wrote:

Clifton, I just caught that clip this morning. It is priceless!

19. Clifton Harrison wrote:

yeah, i mean, when i get fed up wit O’ Reilly, i play that clip of him goin ape shit, but Jon Stewart packaged all of Faux News bullshit up in one great clip!!

Damn i love youtube!!

20. Garrett wrote:

Ya know what’s a real possibility? Obama wins the popular vote but loses the electoral college. Man, that would be freaking awesome. Please, oh, please let that happen.

21. Clifton Harrison wrote:

Have you checked out the youtube clip Garrett?? HAHAHA, you belong right up there with the rest of them….lol

22. Garrett wrote:

I’ll save my laughs for November 5th, thanks.

23. Clifton Harrison wrote:

figured…people like you love to hide from the truth. Do me this favor. On Nov 5th, go on to itunes, search for a hip hop artist named young jeezy, and by the last song on his cd “Recession”, the title is “My President is Black”!!!

24. Tanya wrote:

Clif,

There you go quoting rappers again!

25. Tanya wrote:

I think only a simpleton would attempt to derive facts and sincere political analysis from a comedy show. If you find validity in that, you must also find it wise to receive your financial advice from the cartoon network.

I guess “they” were right; the majority of people are stupid and easily fooled.

Garrett, I thank GOD every day for the Electoral College!!!

26. Clifton Harrison wrote:

Tanya,

Have you watched the clip? (simple yes or no answer required)

27. John wrote:

Prof. Hill referred to Gov. Palin as “Mayor of Mayberry” this morning on Fox News’ “Bulls and Bears” business program. When called out on the unwarranted putdown, he denied he was trying to minimize her and that he referred to her “small town”, which is actually a small city, as Mayberry because he forgot that its name is Wasilla.

This sort of snobbishness and disdain, coming from Obama operatives and a self-described “public intellectual”, plays very poorly to nonelite Americans.

28. Ann wrote:

Hey ya’ll..

okay who saw Rihanna and T.I. on the MTV awards last night…they were by far the hottest performance.

~Ann~

29. DCI74 wrote:

Let it go Clif, Republicans can’t answer straight questions, hell Garrett still can’t even admit he voted for Bush twice.

30. Clifton Harrison wrote:

yeah, true….

31. Iani wrote:

Ann….
I kept saying, who is that girl??? Who is that?…After the first number the announcer said, “…well you have already seen Rhianna”…Thats the only way I knew who she was…..She was really hot, wish I could see the clip over again. I became a Rhianna fan last night & that number reminded me of the old Michael Jackson Thriller with all the ghosts, goblins, imps & blood suckers. Don’t you think so?

32. Tanya wrote:

Clif,

YES! Yes I saw the youtube clip you suggested. Do you think I would offer a comment without looking at it?

Not only did I see the comedy clip, but I also saw most of the original news pieces that the comedy clip was based on.

Did you see the full original news pieces from which this comedy clip was based on??????

If you did, you would know how grossly these statements were taken out of context, for the sole purpose of COMEDY!!!!

I’m sure there are comments from you and everyone else on this blog, including myself, that if taken from one post made in one specific context, and compared it to another comment made on a totally different post regarding a totally different context, a comedian could exploit a forced and utterly irrelevant contradiction. That’s spin!!!

Again Clif, don’t take things out of context! (like you did that Palin comment)

33. Tanya wrote:

Interestingly enough, the only thing truly comedic here is that you and others always try to discredit Republicans for an alleged use of spin, but you yourselves (Democrats) are the ultimate spin-masters that can ONLY cast doubt on Republicans with your malicious mastery of spin.

34. Clifton Harrison wrote:

uh huh…i see you can’t follow directions. Simple yes or no answer, thats all.

and whats funny, even though you have Karl Rove, Dick Morris, Bill O reilly caught red handed talking that bull, you still try and argue a point.

you get an “A” for effort, but Tanya, the context was provided, and Jon Stewart helped show the Faux News true colors….brown..for bullshit (sorta like most of your arguments)

35. Clifton Harrison wrote:

And you can dismiss Jon Stewart if you want, you can go right ahead with Garrett and check out that Young Jeezy Nov. 5th! Or better yet, get Nas’s new cd, last track, “Black President”!!

36. Tanya wrote:

Clif,

You’re young, and dumb, that is very clear.

I gave you a direct YES. Did you miss that?

Not only did I give you a simple and direct YES, but for the benefit of your simple mind, I thought it important to explain my reaction to the clip as expressed in my #25.

Again, “they” were right; the majority of people are stupid and easily fooled.

SMH

37. Clifton Harrison wrote:

sure, we went down this route before….go watch some Faux News

38. Tanya wrote:

And obviously you missed this, but I AM a huge Obama fan, and I would be pleased with him in the White House.

How about you give Young Jeezy and all those other rappers a break for a moment and go read some of Obama’s positions on the young black youth and why they are so far behind.

It might help you!

39. Clifton Harrison wrote:

no…because i’m not a black youth that’s behind….why don’t you get your hannity and O’Reilly fix, and pretend you know politics….

40. Tanya wrote:

Clif,

BTW – “the context was provided”

You have to be a real idiot to say that!

How was the context provided when they only showed the few seconds of the words they wanted to show and did not show the full conversation and what caused them to say those words.

SMH

41. Tanya wrote:

The only pretending going on is with you, if you think you are not behind!!!!

42. DCI74 wrote:

Tanya,

I have a couple of questions for you and let me preface them by saying this first, I am not even attempting to be argumentative or are trying to make this personal, I’m just really curious as to how you can explain this regarding the aforementioned video:

In reference to the pregnancy of Bristol Palin, Bill O’Reilly made it very clear that teen pregnancy was a personal matter but becomes a policy issue if taxpayers have to support the family and he said nothing disparaging about the Palin family or specifically Palin and her husband as parents in fact he was very polite, supportive and complimentary. Meanwhile a few months back Jamie Lynn Spears gets pregnant and her parents according to him are “pinheads,” how is that not a display of inconsistent analysis? Considering Jamie Lynn is a multi-millionare and certainly won’t need any taxpayer assistance to raise her child why is it acceptable to insult her parents? Why is a not still a personal issue, why the name-calling?

How is it not blatantly sexist according to Dick Morris so say in reference to the media’s dealing with Palin that “this is sexism and a man would never have to deal with this kind of treatment” yet just a few months before that Morris says in reference to Hilary complaining about sexist media treatment “this is what Hilary always does, whenever she gets under fire she retreats under the apron strings.” How is that not sexist? For the record I saw the live broadcast of all of these segments so the context was very clear and precise. Do you honestly see no flaws in this at all?

43. Tanya wrote:

DC, my dear,

Thank you very much for raising those very important and astute questions.

But please understand that I don’t take anything, especially reasonable questioning, personally. So although it was a polite thing for you to offer your disclaimer, don’t worry, I never harbor hard feelings anyway.

In response to your questions:

Regarding O’Reilly on teen pregnancy:

If you saw the full segment on why Jamie Lynn’s parents were pinheads – O’Reilly made it clear that Britney is a complete mess. She has a sting of serious problems from here to Timbuktu. Britney has problems with drugs and alcohol and is a “bad parent” herself. NOW their other daughter ends up a pregnant teen. Clearly there is a problem with their parenting if BOTH of their daughters are apparently doing wrong things. That’s why Bill called them pinheads.

If all of Palin’s kids had problems then Bill would call her a pinhead too!

Regarding Dick Morris:

If you saw the whole segment they were talking about whether Palin would be a good mother AND a good VP. No one questions whether a man would be a good father AND a good VP. That was the sexism Morris was talking about.

Hilary however, conveniently claims sexism when moderators ask her the first question in debates. She claimed they were picking on her, b/c she was a woman, and was asking her the FIRST questions to intimidate her b/c she was a woman. That’s ridiculous, and that’s why Morris said she was hiding behind the apron.

As a woman, I understand that if you want to play the boys’ game, you can’t get mad when they test you and throw hard questions at you. Hilary was getting mad b/c they were “testing” her. She should be stronger than that. She claimed to be stronger than most men, yet she runs and hides when they “test” her. That’s what Morris was talking about.

That comedy clip was nothing but that, comedy. Pure spin-ed comedy!

44. Tanya wrote:

PS – Why do you guys make me work so hard??? Why do I always have to explain everything??? Next time I’m just going to say “look it up”!

45. Clifton Harrison wrote:

DC, you shoulda listened to the advice you gave me..haha

46. Clifton Harrison wrote:

So Palin is just 1/5th of a pinhead…

47. Tanya wrote:

Clif, you simple child you,

Bill is not calling every parent in the world whose teenage daughter ends up pregnant, a pinhead.

There are thousand of good parents, who have teens that have sex with their boyfriend and end up pregnant.

Bill didn’t call Beyonce’s parents pinheads when Solonge got pregnant at 17.

But Bill is calling Britney’s parents pinheads b/c, obviously, in addition to, and above and beyond Jamie Lynne being a pregnant teen, they are pinheads.

That’s the point!

48. Mark wrote:

Marc, I liked your O’Reilly Factor piece. You held your own well. Good assessment on the attacks on Palin.

You’re right: If we judged candidates based on their family lives, none of them would be qualified. Good point.

Enjoy the vacation.

49. Ann wrote:

Hey Marc….I hope you are meeting your deadlines….

50. jay wrote:

Marc, get some rest but PLEASE come back. We need you. I love your blog!

51. ChgoSista wrote:

JUST WANNA THROW IN THAT BRITNEY WAS G-R-O-W-N when she became a parent; therefore, we can’t REEEALLLLLY blame MOMMA LYNNE for her ill-behavior ANYMORE.

Thank you.

That is all.

52. Tanya wrote:

Chgo,

Have you ever heard that saying, “Charity begins at home”???

The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. If Britney was taught properly as a child, she would act properly as an adult.

The issues people have in adulthood, almost always stem from problems in their childhood. Who is responsible for your childhood? – Your parents!!!

How could you NOT see that her mom has something to do with the fact that she is a loon AND a bad parent???

Again sista, what “the f*** you thinking”??? lol

You’re Welcome!

53. Tanya wrote:

BTW – I don’t think anyone who thinks straight would consider Lynne Spears a good mother! Heck, Lynne herself, admits she wasn’t a good mother. (Get that book Chgo!)

She WILL NOT be nominated for any Mother of the Year awards any time soon. I can guarantee that!

But if you think she is NOT a pinhead, and she did a GREAT job as a mom, well then….OK!

54. Clifton Harrison wrote:

“The issues people have in adulthood, almost always stem from problems in their childhood. Who is responsible for your childhood? – Your parents!!!

How could you NOT see that her mom has something to do with the fact that she is a loon AND a bad parent???”

So going with your logic Tanya, wouldn’t Palin be to blame for her daughter having unprotected sex, sex before marriage, underage drinking?

55. Tanya wrote:

YES! Clif I think she would!

56. Clifton Harrison wrote:

hmm, interesting……

57. Tanya wrote:

But being to blame for something, and being an overall pinhead parent, is two different things.

I understand that parents can not control every single thing their children do.

I understand that TV and peers, have a great influence on kids.

I understand that kids, like all people, make mistakes.

But making a mistake, and having serious issues are two different things.

I also understand that none of Palin’s children have drug or alcohol addiction, or any serious issues. I understand that none of them have repetitive and severe problems like Britney that can be linked directly to poor parenting.

Therefore, I do not think Palin is a pinhead parent.

But based on Lynne Spears’ long failed track record of poor parenting, she is a pinhead parent.

If you think Spears is not a pinhead parent, that’s your opinion, so fine!

Just understand that Spears being a pinhead it O’Reilly’s opinion and just b/c he doesn’t see Palin as a pinhead, doesn’t mean there is a contradiction. You have to hold people to the same stand, and O’Reilly did just that.

Lynne Spears – 1 daughter completely messed up and 1 daughter a pregnant teen. = pinhead parent.

Sarah Palin – Only 1 daughter pregnant teen, but rest of children on the right path (1 son an honorable solider), plus she has a demanding career. = not a pinhead parent

Again, according to Bill, if you can name one of Palin’s other kids who is completely messed up, then you “win”! Palin is a pinhead too!

If you can’t, then you have to accept a difference between the two as parents. And you have to understand the difference in Bill’s analysis.

58. Tanya wrote:

*standard

59. Ced wrote:

If you preach “abstinence only” and you teenage daughter ends up pregnant, you are pinhead just like Spears. Lynne Spears didn’t teach “abstinence only” and her daughter got pregnant; Palin “taught it” and ended up with the same result!!! WTF!! They’re both pinheads!! Or pencilheads!!

60. Miss Martin wrote:

I agree Ced….

61. ChgoSista wrote:

LOVE U CED!!!!!!!

62. Clifton Harrison wrote:

Exactly…..

*waiting for Tanya to quote the bible, insult ced and spin the facts like Bill O’Reilly*

63. wouldn't you like to know? wrote:

Clif,

you’re sooo fuggin’ funny, you know that?

64. Clifton Harrison wrote:

thank you…i do my best…

65. Tanya wrote:

If Ced thinks Palin is a pinhead for teaching her daughter Abstinence-Only. I could see his logic there. So fine!

If Ced thinks Palin is beyond/worst than a pinhead b/c her daughter ended up pregnant despite Abstinence-Only. I could see his logic there. So fine!

(I support Abstinence-Only so I would disagree with Ced, but I can still see his logic.)

BUT THAT IS NOT THE DISCUSSION HERE!!!!

Clif, you said that O’Reilly was a hypocrite b/c he called Spears a pinhead and NOT Palin.

(Poor Clif)

I explained to Clif, that based on the same “O’Reilly standard of a pinhead” Palin didn’t fit!

If I said an idiot is someone whose first name begins with a “C” and last name begins with a “H”.

Then I say:

Clif is an idiot!

And then two months later I say:

Ced is a smart guy!

Stupid Sally would say, “Tanya your a hypocrite. You called Clif an idiot, but you call Ced a smart guy! Ced’s first name begins with a “C” too, so according to you, Ced must be an idiot too!”

Then WYLTK, with her sharp fierce self, would point out to Stupid Sally that Tanya only called Cliff an idiot b/c his first name began with a “C” AND, AND, AND his second name began with a “H”! So since Ced’s last name does NOT begin with an “H”, therefore, according to Tanya, Ced is not an idiot.

AND ALL THE SMART PEOPLE WOULD AGREE WITH WYLTK!!!!!

66. Tanya wrote:

*Edit*

Where I said “second name” I obviously meant LAST name!

67. Clifton Harrison wrote:

All that is missing Tanya is a scripture….

68. Clifton Harrison wrote:

*5..4..3..2..and….action!!*

69. Tanya wrote:

…and then WYLTK gives “two snaps, a twist, and a wiggle” as she exits the Barbershop after school you fools!!!!

LMAO!!!

70. Tanya wrote:

Why am I not surprised that Clif didn’t catch on to that little story!

To be clear:

This is NOT about My definition of a pinhead. This is NOT about Ced’s definition of a pinhead. This is ONLY about Bill O’Reilly’s definition of a pinhead parent.

Clif insinuated that O’Reilly was a hypocrite b/c he called Spears a pinhead, and did not call Palin a pinhead.

“Jon Stewart packaged all of Faux News bullshit up in one great clip!!”
Comment by Clifton Harrison — September 5, 2008 @ 12:54 pm

“GREATEST Example of exposing the media’s lies…EVER!”
Comment by clifton harrison — September 4, 2008 @ 6:26 pm

I tried to explain to Clif that a hypocrite is someone who, basically, holds people to different standards, to be short.

I tried to point out to Clif that O’Reilly made it clear that someone is a pinhead parent if they have MORE than 1 child “messed up”!

Lynne Spears has MORE than 1 child “messed up”.

Sarah Palin has ONLY 1 child “messed up”.

Therefore Spears is a pinhead and Palin is not. (according to Bill O’Reilly)

That’s NOT being a hypocrite!!! O’Reilly is holding both women to the SAME standard. Therefore, you can’t call O’Reilly a hypocrite regarding his pinhead parent comment.

Clif called the man a name without having any valid reason to substantiate it.

The discussion is not about what a pinhead parent is, to you, me, or anyone else!

The discussion here is whether or not O’Reilly is a hypocrite for calling Spears a pinhead and Palin not.

71. Clifton Harrison wrote:

ahhh, Tanya…I spell it out once more, even tough it’s displayed by the clip, and knowing that you still won’t get it, but here you go:

Bill O’Reilly argued that Palins family life should be judged by the media, that millions of Americans deal with teenage pregnancy, and that it is a personal issue. When it came the spears family, he primarily blamed the parents, calling them “Incredible pinheads”.

So Why aren’t Sarah Palin and her husband considered parents Tanya? Explain that.

I was also saying that personally, i don’t feel that Sarah Palin’s daughters pregnancy is a totally private matter.

“Why is that Clif?”

Because Sarah Palin wants abstinence only taught in schools, which is a policy matter and if she has the possibility of running this country and passing a law like that (but within her own family, that very teaching has not been successful), i feel it is the media’s/press duty to question her about it.

I don’t think bringing it up as a scandal or as grounds for her not being ready to lead the country, but the fact that she believes in abstinence only and that teaching didn’t work in her own family leads me to question her judgement and quite frankly her sanity

72. Clifton Harrison wrote:

Your whole argument about one kid being messed up yada yada yada…bullshit!

As much as you would like Tanya, the facts are clear.

Karl Rove, Dick Morris, Bill O’Reilly = Lying sacks of shit

73. Clifton Harrison wrote:

**As much as you would like to spin it Tanya, the facts are clear**

74. Ced loves WYLTK and ChgoSista wrote:

Tanyeezie,

You spin more than THE EARTH AROUND THE SUN.

It doesn’t matter if you have 1 fuckup child or 20 fuckup chil’len. BodyOdor (B.O.) is not gonna criticize her because she is Red, PBP(point blank period). This discussion is about his “biasability” (coined it!) Any word to describe BodyOdor is probably correct.

Clif is a fool! (I mean that sooo cool!)

Garrett, all I read when you post is

askdjfhnfkjandsk fksdjaf ksjdfh nklasj fskadfh lksahf k
askdf hksjdhf kajshidfdhuyeroiubvnhsfafkjajbush

75. Tanya wrote:

Clif,

Someone needs to huge you!

“So Why aren’t Sarah Palin and her husband considered parents Tanya? Explain that.”

(I know you meant to ask why aren’t they *pinhead parents.)

I EXPLAINED THAT! LORD HAVE MERCY! RE-READ the comments!

NONE of Sarah Palin’s other kids have half the problems similar to the drug addict, alcoholic, lunatic ways of Britney Spears.

Every family has 1 “black sheep”. There is often 1 kid who wants to push the limits, be a rebel, etc. But if most of your kids are jacked up, there’s a serious, and yes maybe even a pinhead-like problem with the parents!

AGAIN!!! In order to meet Bill’s qualifications of a pinhead parent, you have to have more than 1 kid doing something wrong. Like I’ve asked you before, Does any of Sarah Palin’s other kids have issues???

So YES, the FACTS are VERY CLEAR!!!!

Second, as I said in comment #134 on the “Open Post”:

Clif,

“…i have no problem with Palin and her daughter being pregnant. My problem is with her idea that abstinence only teaching works when it didnt even work within her own family.”

Well Clif, I must say, that is a very legitimate stance.

If you want to have a discussion about whether or not Abstinence only works, and why it didn’t work with Bristol, then that is an intelligent and important discussion to have.
But for you to waste time and try to call the Republican Party as a whole, hypocrites for requesting people to respect Sarah and Bristol is just down right ridiculous.

Please note that Bill O’Reilly is an INDEPENDANT, and he had a legitimate reason to call Lynne Spears a pinhead. He did not call all parents of pregnant teens pinheads.

So for you, or anyone else, to try and link the whole Republican Party to his comments, or make it a Republican stance that Lynne is a pinhead, and therefore all Republicans are hypocritical in supporting Sarah, is just the most idiotic thing possible.

Don’t be an idiot. Discuss the issues, don’t spin.”

Comment by Tanya — September 10, 2008 @ 5:10 pm

76. Tanya wrote:

It took every once of self-control I have in my entire body NOT to call Clif names in that last post!

I’m proud of myself!

But DC, come get ya boy! Please!

77. Tanya wrote:

*ounce

78. Clifton Harrison wrote:

Once again, you don’t understand the argument. It’s not about how maany kids they have that are messed up which determines the parents pinhead status.

Bill O’Reilly argued that Palins family life should be judged by the media, that millions of Americans deal with teenage pregnancy, and that it is a personal issue. When it came the spears family, he primarily blamed the parents, calling them “Incredible pinheads”

79. Clifton Harrison wrote:

*many*

oh, and

“Bill O’Reilly argued that Palins family life should not be judged by the media”

When it was Palin’s issue, its off limits because its a family issue, all americans go through it.

A Spears issue, the parents are pnheads.

That’s O’Reillys argument

80. Tanya wrote:

Clif,

No sweat young child. YOU don’t understand.

“It’s not about how maany kids they have that are messed up which determines the parents pinhead status.”

YES IT IS!!! Bill made it VERY CLEAR that b/c Britney is “messed up” and still going through lots of mess, and NOW Jamie Lynne becomes pregnant as a teen – the parents are having problems PARENTING, and so, they are pinheads.

Based on ***BILL’S CRITERIA***, it is the number of problems in the family that warrants the parents as pinheads.

This is were context clues and comprehension comes in.

Do you know WHY Bill called Britney and Jamie Lynne’s parents “Incredible Pinheads”?????

Ask yourself WHY he called them that, and then try to figure out if Palin fits that same WHY!!!

81. Tanya wrote:

You have NOOOO idea what Bill’s argument is.

Maybe if you watched his WHOLE segment you would.

But No, you rather just watch the 5 seconds that a comedian edited for JOKES, and consider that fact.

FYI darling, you can’t take comedians seriously, ok!

82. Mario wrote:

I didn’t see a blog on CNN’s Black in America. If I overlooked one tell me where it is. My college just had a discussion on it about 2 weeks ago. I’ve really been wanting to hear other peoples’ opinions on it. I felt it was pretty good though a focus was a little too much on the negative side. I would have liked to see a little more about success in the black community.