1. Regkam2 wrote:

Marc, I don’t understand why u continue to go on shows like this when there is NEVER an opportunity for one to share his views without being labeled and rudely interrupted by that knucklehead, Colmes (or Hannity I don’t know one from the other). Discussions like this is useless. When will Blacks realized that we don’t have to justify who we endorse and call our leaders to others. Other ethnic groups don’t come to us and ask our opinions on who they call leaders and heroes.

2. John wrote:

Sean Hannity has obviously never read this blog, or he would know exactly why Marc won’t stand up against the racist/anti-Semitic/homophobic views of Farrahkan and Khallid.

3. DCI74 wrote:

What I learned from Faux News in this interview:

That even if you answer a question it’s always going to be considered the wrong answer if it’s not consistent with the perspective of Faux News.

4. Regkam2 wrote:

1st, again, Blacks cannot be racist. Racism is prejudice plus power. Racism is a group dynamic not what an individual says. 2nd, Blacks cannot be anti-semetic since Semites originated in Northern Africa and in the Middle East. Blacks are descendants of Semites people thus they can’t be anti-semetic. This term has been used by ashkenazi Jews since the late 1800s and needs to stop.

John, since u have such of a problem with Marc’s site, why do u continue to come? Again, you or others of your ilk cannot choose who we stand for or against. Again, can we say ‘God-Complex’……

5. ChgoSista wrote:

Dr. Marc, do u b needin’ a drank when u b done w/intvws on FOX?

6. RWS wrote:

Did Michael Steele basically say that black people are relunctant denounce MLF’s statements about white people because the black experience proves that MLF’s states are in large part accurate?

7. kenda wrote:

where is hannity’s moral outrage over mccain’s acceptance of hagee’s support?

8. Jay wrote:

Dr. Hill, you got clowned again, and the only reason he does these shows is because he is a talking head jerk

9. ChgoSista wrote:

10. Samuel wrote:

I don’t know how important it is to get your name spelled right, so I apologize for the mis-spelling of Marc. I have a friend here at work named Mark so it’s out of habit.

11. Mike wrote:

Sean must of been salty to hear Michael Steele agree with Marc in regards to the context of MLF’s comments. I agree with Marc on this issue. I am not a Barrack Supporter but it is very easy to see that the republicans are using the hatred for Muslims to scare people away from Barrack and they are basically misleading the people. I listen to Sean on the radio and I agree with most of what he says but when it comes to winning elections he is pretty vicious.

I am glad Michael Steele a conservative was willing to see what Sean was doing and say something in the defense of the point of the context of MLF’s statements.

12. ChgoSista wrote:

Samuel, I wonder/hope someone addresses your question [about where the $ went/where it was applied/how it was used].

13. Mike wrote:

What does it matter. That little bit of money was not and did not make a difference in the lives of black people in America. I think what was more powerful than the actual money is the message about the power black people can have with a little unity. Unfortunately, the cause to change the values of Gen x,Y,Z is not an agenda most black people want to get behind. I guess because it will look to much like a conservative movement asking people to take responsibility for their lives and the lives of their families.

14. Tom Penn wrote:

WoW ! I’m surprised that when Dr. Hill had his chance to get his man Farrakhan’s back, the Doc backed down.

15. Marito Lopez wrote:

Sean is so ignorant…where is his moral courage?

16. PP wrote:

Michael Steele is not an Uncle Tom and he in fact defended Marc position. Can we not tear each other down but agree to disagree