What Happened To Obama’s Office of Urban Policy?
April 27, 2009 by Marc Lamont Hill
After 100 days, Obama’s shiny-new dream for our cities is looking more like a bureaucratic nightmare.

What Happened to the Office of Urban Policy
By Dayo Olopade
In November 2008, less than one week after winning the votes of city dwellers by a margin of 28 points, President-elect Barack Obama announced he would reward them by creating the first-ever “White House Office of Urban Policy.” Like other new aspects of Obama’s executive branch, appointing a city czar was intended to fast-track communications among city governments, federal agencies and the White House. With great fanfare, Obama dispatched his friend and fellow Chicagoan Valerie Jarrett to tell America that he was making good on his campaign pledge to “stop seeing cities as the problem and start seeing them as the solution.”
When the office was officially formed in mid-February, urbanists rejoiced: “It’s past time,” said Elnora Watson, president of the Urban League in Jersey City, N.J., as she walked the halls of Congress recently. “Way past time,” added Ella Teal, another Urban League president from the neighboring city of Elizabeth. “Cities will lead America,” Newark Mayor Cory Booker said at an April speech on city government in Washington. “When it comes to industry, innovation, education and the arts … cities are where it’s at.”
But celebrations about the potential triumph of urban policy may be premature. In recent weeks, the Obama administration has begun referring to the office as “urban affairs,” rather than “urban policy,” a small but notable downgrade. And while other offices and Cabinet agencies have been staffing up—the Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships has representation in 12 government agencies—100 days in, urban affairs has announced only two senior staffers: Derek Douglas, who was special adviser to New York Gov. David Paterson, and former Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrion, Jr., who faces allegations of mismanaging campaign donations and development projects in New York City.
As money from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act started going out to cash-strapped states and municipalities, Vice President Joe Biden traveled to Pikeville, N.C., this month to specifically address how the stimulus would affect rural America. “As we write a new chapter in our history, the small towns of America … will have to be some of the most prominent of its authors,” he said.
The comparative silence from urban affairs has not gone unnoticed. Diana Lind, editor of Next American City, a journal that covers urban policy, frets that “this isn’t going to be as serious and as powerful a role as many urbanists had hoped.”
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
2 Comments
1. Diana wrote:
I agree. What happened to most of the things President Obama promised? It seems like a lot of what he promised, he’s done the opposite. He’s been placed on a pedestal that he is bound to fall off. No one can remain on a pedestal, have so many people pulling at him from all directions, and try to please everyone without falling off the pedestal he was put on. I see so many things that I am concerned about and just don’t know what to think anymore. On Inauguration Day, he convinced me that there was hope for a better country, but the very next day he went the other direction. I don’t have hope anymore. Getting it back is going to be hard with all the things going on in the country. I am no longer convinced that President Obama can make a difference….mostly because of the people in congress (on both sides of the isle) fighting petty squabbles that help no one. Thanks for listening…
Di
April 27, 2009 @ 4:36 pm2. Bitter Brother wrote:
Well, if one knows that no one can remain on a pedestal, then one shouldn’t be struck by that fact coming to fruition. Judging by the sense of deep disappointment emanating from the rhetoric of many of Obama’s disaffected acolytes, its evident that this act of pre-election incredulity concerning the sundry promises made by Obama was just that…an act. Everyone should’ve remembered what their mother told them about things that seemed too good to be true. What’s ironic is that those people who admired Obama during his campaign but were lambasted for the healthy criticisms, we provided copious amounts of, that his platform was too lofty and idealistic to work, are pretty pleased with the progress he has made. Too many expectations invariably leads to disappointment. He is prioritizing quite well in my opinion. In order to address the troubled areas of our nation we need money, any repairs being done before the economy would be ineffectual and anachronistic.
April 28, 2009 @ 10:38 amLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments

