What’s The Matter With Teen Sexting?
February 9, 2009 by Marc Lamont Hill

Sex and predatory adults are not the biggest dangers teenagers face online. Their main risk is garden-variety kid-on-kid meanness.
What’s the Matter with Teen Sexting?
By Judith Levine
A couple of weeks ago, in Greensburg, Pennsylvania, prosecutors charged six teenagers with creating, distributing, and possessing child pornography. The three girls, ages 14 and 15, took nude or seminude pictures of themselves and e-mailed them to friends, including three boys, ages 16 and 17, who are among the defendants. Police Captain George Seranko described the obscenity of the images: They “weren’t just breasts,” he declared. “They showed female anatomy!”
Greensburg’s crime-stoppers aren’t the only ones looking out for the cybersafety of America’s youth. In Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, New Jersey, New York, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Utah (at last count) minors have been arrested for “sexting,” or sending or posting soft-core photo or video self-portraits. Of 1,280 teens and young adults surveyed recently by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, one in five said they engaged in the practice — girls only slightly more than boys.
Seranko and other authorities argue that such pictures may find their way to the Internet and from there to pedophiles and other exploiters. “It’s very dangerous,” he opined.
How dangerous is it? Not very, suggests a major study released this month by Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet Studies. “Enhancing Child Safety and Online Technologies,” the result of a yearlong investigation by a wide range of experts, concludes that “the risks minors face online are in most cases not significantly different from those they face offline, and as they get older, minors themselves contribute to some of the problems.” Almost all youth who end up having sex with adults they meet online seek such assignations themselves, fully aware that the partner is older. Similarly, minors who encounter pornography online go looking for it; they tend to be older teenage boys.
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
4 Comments
1. R.oB. wrote:
Clearly there is a problem when adults, who are supposed to be the responsible ones, think it’s OK to label a girl sending her boyfriend a racy picture, esp. if the two are sexually active. You create criminality out of nothing.
February 9, 2009 @ 5:22 pm2. jordan wrote:
There are a number of issues that teenagers and adults seem to understand differently when it comes to the internet and related technology. First, adults lamented the death of grammar and sentence structure evidenced by teens’ texting and messaging habits. Then there’s downloading of music and questions about whether or not kids even understand copy writing and authorship in digital media.
The sexting thing raises questions like that for me. Do kids understand what it means to put naked images of yourself into the world? Would these same girls have taken naked pictures of themselves on old fashioned film and then dropped those bad boys off at the one-hour photo both for some middle-aged guy to develop? Do they really think a naked picture of themselves is less real if it’s digital?
On the otherhand, how paranoid are adults being about media that is arguably more foreign to them than to their children? And, What role does discomfort with teen sexuality play in this case?
3. DCI74 wrote:
I’ve seen and heard about this from the kids in my programs. It’s really interesting because kids today are very technology savvy yet they don’t fully grasp the permanency of certain things on the internet. Just like you pointed out jordan, there is a distinct difference between how adults and youth view the technology and the internet.
February 12, 2009 @ 2:05 pm4. Jonathan wrote:
You want it to stop? Then ban Text Messaging services for anyone under the age of 18… problem solved. Kids need to quit texting anyway…. they spend more time texting than then they do studying. A generation of sexually charged idiots. It comes down to parents paying for their kids to have unlimited text messaging plans. If parents would simply not pay for their children to text each other these pictures in the first place and pay more attention to what their kids are doing on the Internet, the problem would cease to exist.
April 13, 2009 @ 4:40 pmLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments

