The Cultural Politics of Dog Fighting
July 26, 2007 by Marc Lamont Hill
In the land of designer pet collars, pet cemeteries, even pet-themed restaurants and bakeries, dogfighting has reared its ugly head.

Who’s Doggin’ Who?
By Tobias Peterson
From any perspective, it’s a gruesome tale. Since late April, developments have steadily emerged—in increasingly gory detail—about NFL superstar Michael Vick’s alleged involvement in illegal dogfighting. Recently, Vick was indicted by a grand jury for his ties to “Bad Newz Kennels”, a group that bred pit bulls and fought them in illegal matches, some of which are suspected of taking place at a home owned by Vick in southern Virginia. In addition, Vick stands accused of having dogs put down (as well as doing it himself) with extreme measures: gunshot, electrocution, drowning, and strangulation. In one alleged incident, a dog was killed by being smashed against the ground.
As more of these allegations have come to light, public outrage at Vick has grown accordingly. Both the NFL and Vick’s team, the Atlanta Falcons, have been the targets of picketing and protests by members of the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), and the Humane Society. These groups are far from alone, though. In addition to the usual sources of sports-related outrage (talk radio hosts and newspaper columnists chief among them), indignation has poured down from the highest levels of government, with Senators Robert Byrd and John Kerry coming out publicly against Vick and the unspeakable acts of which he stands accused.
Beyond Vick’s precipitous fall from public favor, though, there’s also a financial cost to bear for all of this. As one of the leagues most explosive and high-profile players, Vick has been, quite literally, a poster boy for both the Falcons and the NFL since his arrival to the league in 2001. Even as the first details of his involvement with dogfighting were surfacing, he was showcased at the 2007 NFL draft in support of the victims of the Virginia Tech massacre (both Vick and his younger brother Marcus played quarterback for the school). Now, however, sponsors are abandoning the standout like rats from a sinking ship.
For its part, Nike—which has released several lines of Vick-brand clothing and shoes—has suspended the release of its latest model, the “Air Zoom Vick V” (though previous items will remain available for purchase). The NFL, too, has been forced to take steps to insure its ratings and quell the controversy. The league’s new commissioner, Roger Godell, who began his tenure by suspending troubled defensive back Adam “PacMan” Jones, has sought to shore up his image as a disciplinarian in light of Vick’s alleged transgressions. Most recently (as of this writing), he’s prevented the quarterback from attending the team’s preseason training camp, reserving the right for further disciplinary action as more information comes to light.
Before the dogfighting scandal, it should be noted, Vick’s image was already suffering. He had an apparent run-in with airport security, who accused Vick of smuggling marijuana in a water bottle (no legal action came of the incident). He also made waves by offering an obscene gesture to a group of Falcons fans during a loss last season. In the court of public opinion, however, arguing with a TSA staffer or shooting the bird pale in comparison to fighting pit bulls. On television and the web, brutal images and videos of injured and killed dogs, invariably juxtaposed with shots of cute and cuddly puppies, serve as stark indictments of the brutality and cruelty that these animals endure, stoking the fire of public anger ever higher.
- Categories: MLH
- |
Advertisement
11 Comments
1. DCI74 wrote:
The complete indictment is one of the most disturbing things I’ve read in quite a while.
July 26, 2007 @ 9:49 am2. Garrett wrote:
They’re called laws, Tarik. Break them and suffer the consequences. There are some folks tickled by the idea of anarchy, I’m not one of them.
July 26, 2007 @ 12:36 pm3. DCI74 wrote:
Likewise Brother Spotless. Just like I said regarding the Duke case, I will reserve any judgement until all the facts come to light. I understand what the NFL is doing from a PR perspective but a lot of people are running away with opinions regarding Vick before the case has even been tried. I’m gonna wait and see.
July 26, 2007 @ 12:58 pm4. dockdr wrote:
Tarik, yes it is that serious! There is no way to compare prisoners who commit horrible crimes being given the death penalty to innocent puppies being violently abused to the point that they become aggressive. These puppies who grow into adult dogs were not given a choice about whether or not they became aggressive. That choice is made for them by their owners. People who commit crimes choose through numerous small decisions to engage in criminal activity. Criminals have a choice, they make their choice, and are given consequences. THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE.
Also, the SPCA would have killed them humanely by putting them to sleep. Vick allegedly drowned, beat, shot, and electrocuted these dogs. Aagain, A BIG DIFFERENCE!!!!!
If he is guilty, can we give him the same treatment he gave these dogs who didn’t ask to be trained to be aggressive?
July 26, 2007 @ 3:54 pm5. Blessing wrote:
strangulation? electrocution? I’m not even an animal lover and I find that disturbing.
July 27, 2007 @ 10:34 am11. gylq gtwhcx wrote:
gaekzuy jpmktaud zsek jomgtik zecqmvxd dkhtazyge hqpuyjkgs
January 18, 2008 @ 5:49 pmLeave a Reply

- Advertise with us
- Advertise with us
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- WPD on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said "Dr" Hill is pathetic.

- Esty on Is The Occupy Wall Street Movement More Racist Than The Tea Party? said Occupy Wall St. is just straight stupid. I work on ...

- F Mize on OPEN POST said Marc, I saw your interview on O'reilly tonight and ...

- View More Comments

