Comments on: Why I Support The Fairness Doctrine

By: RIP: The Fairness Doctrine | The Liberal OC

RIP: The Fairness Doctrine | The Liberal OC — Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:48:43 +0000

[...] [...]

By: In defense of the Fairness Doctrine – defending a more equal media « Views Across the Pond

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:26:42 +0000

[...] as Rush Limbaugh would have you believe because of the revoking of the Fairness Doctrine. As Dr Mark Lamont Hill points out: “the rise in conservative radio has been paralleled by an equally sharp drop in local [...]

By: leo

leo — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:28:26 +0000

Liberals have……..Msnbc ( took bailout), CNN, ABC , CBS , ESPN , BRAVO CHANNEL , UNIVISION , TELEMUNDO, ALL OF THESE MEDIA OUTLETS ……ARE LIBERAL . WHAT IS ALL THE FUSS ABOUT.

By: The Australian Conservative » Blog Archive » Fox News on the spot in Marc Lamont Hill scandal

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:26:18 +0000

[...] had done any elementary analysis, they might have discovered that back in 2007, he wrote an article, “Why I Support the Fairness Doctrine,” hyping a study by the Center for American [...]

By: The Two Malcontents » Fox News on the Spot in Marc Lamont Hill Scandal

The Two Malcontents » Fox News on the Spot in Marc Lamont Hill Scandal — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:33:30 +0000

[...] had done any elementary analysis, they might have discovered that back in 2007, he wrote an article, "Why I Support the Fairness Doctrine," hyping a study by the Center for American [...]

By: Fox News on the Spot in Marc Lamont Hill Scandal « HOME – Other Right Links and Posts

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:09:01 +0000

[...] had done any elementary analysis, they might have discovered that back in 2007, he wrote an article, “Why I Support the Fairness Doctrine,” hyping a study by the Center for American [...]

By: High ratings come from consumer choice « Bunnysbuzz’s Blog

High ratings come from consumer choice « Bunnysbuzz’s Blog — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:19:59 +0000

[...] http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0212-03.htm http://www.marclamonthill.com/mlhblog/?p=3366 Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Why the Fairness Doctrine is Anything But [...]

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:46:41 +0000

The context in which the Fairness Doctrine was formed is now completely unrecognizable. The amount of media outlets in television alone numbers in the double digits, radio, newsprint and magazines spread differing opinions as well. All these sources could still theoretically be controlled by media conglomerates, thereby still leaving a somewhat concrete argument for the Fairness Doctrine. However, the fatal blow to the argument that the government should regulate media is the internet. The internet has created such a massive outlet for alternative media that there is no possible way that any body, the government, a media oligarchy, the CIA, could control American access to differing opinions. The idea that we need the government to provide us with protection from corporate media filtering is laughable.
If the government is regulating the media, who is controlling the output? Essentially, the government is saying “you can’t trust those companies to tell you the truth. Trust us. We’ll tell you the truth.” Excuse me? The government composed of the two party system. That means the media outlets will eschew third party views, and, under orders from the government, parrot the platforms of the Democrat and Republican parties. Additionally, the same companies targeted as the Goebbels-esque bogeymen in the Fairness Doctrine are the same that make seven figure contributions to the coffers of the politicians that would be in charge of bringing truth to the media.

By: fishingreportcalculationscom

fishingreportcalculationscom — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:54:57 +0000

Fishing is great way of spending time and relaxing on the weekends.
Can anyone suggest websites related to fishing

By: blog

blog — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:40:57 +0000

hello…

wonderful…